Tkwn-dmwak-mn-ajly -

d(4)-3=1=a m(13)-3=10=j w(23)-3=20=t a(1)-3=-2 → wrap 24=x k(11)-3=8=h → ajtxh — not. ? No. But given the time, I notice: mn in the code is likely no in plaintext. If m → n is +1, and n → o is +1, then shift is +1. Check: tkwn +1 = ulxo — not English. So not. Step 9: Let's brute-force one word: ajly If ajly = word ? a→w = -4, j→o = -5? No.

Actually, I’ll just give the most plausible decode: tkwn-dmwak-mn-ajly

t(20)-5=15=o k(11)-5=6=f w(23)-5=18=r n(14)-5=9=i → ofri and n → o is +1

Better: ajly decode with shift -3: a(1)-3=-2→x(24) j(10)-3=7→g l(12)-3=9→i y(25)-3=22→v → xgiv — no. j→o = -5? No. Actually

a(1)-5=-4→22=v j(10)-5=5=e l(12)-5=7=g y(25)-5=20=t → vegt