Macroeconomia (2027)

The journey from the Phillips Curve to modern inflation targeting reveals a fundamental evolution in macroeconomic thought. The early Keynesian belief in a stable, exploitable trade-off gave way to the sobering realization that expectations, not just statistical relationships, are the primary drivers of inflation. The stagflation of the 1970s demonstrated the cost of ignoring expectations; the Volcker disinflation showed the painful necessity of building credibility; and the Great Moderation highlighted the benefits of an explicit, rules-based policy framework.

The most dramatic application of this theory came during the of 1979–1982. When newly appointed Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker announced a determined policy to crush double-digit inflation by restricting money supply growth, rational expectations theory predicted that if the policy was credible , inflation expectations would fall quickly, and the recession would be shorter and shallower than under adaptive expectations. In reality, the policy lacked immediate credibility. Businesses and workers doubted the Fed’s resolve, leading to a deep, painful recession with unemployment peaking at nearly 11%. Only after the Fed proved its commitment through sustained contraction did expectations finally adjust, and inflation fell dramatically. This episode taught central bankers that credibility is the most valuable asset they possess. To manage expectations, they needed a clear, transparent, and consistent policy framework. Macroeconomia

For much of the 20th century, macroeconomists believed they had discovered a stable, predictable menu for policymakers: the Phillips Curve. This empirical relationship, which suggested an inverse link between unemployment and wage inflation, offered a seemingly simple trade-off. Societies could choose to tolerate higher inflation in exchange for lower unemployment, or accept a recessionary level of joblessness to keep prices stable. However, the tumultuous economic events of the 1970s—the era of stagflation, where high unemployment and high inflation coexisted—shattered this consensus. This essay argues that the relationship between inflation and unemployment is not a stable, exploitable trade-off but a dynamic, expectation-driven phenomenon. By tracing the evolution of this idea from A.W. Phillips to the Rational Expectations Revolution and into the era of modern inflation targeting, we will see how the failure to manage aggregate demand and supply shocks, alongside the critical role of central bank credibility, has shaped the macroeconomic history of the last seventy years. Ultimately, the quest for macroeconomic stability has shifted from exploiting a mythical trade-off to the more difficult task of anchoring inflation expectations. The journey from the Phillips Curve to modern

The 1970s delivered a devastating empirical refutation of the simple Phillips Curve. Following the OPEC oil embargo of 1973 and subsequent supply shocks, the U.S. and other developed economies experienced simultaneous rises in both unemployment and inflation—stagflation. This was theoretically impossible according to the original Phillips Curve, which had posited that one could only move along the curve, not shift it outward. The most dramatic application of this theory came

In 1958, New Zealand-born economist A.W. Phillips published a seminal paper documenting a negative statistical relationship between unemployment rates and the rate of wage inflation in the United Kingdom from 1861 to 1957. American economists Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow soon replicated this finding for the U.S. economy, coining the term "Phillips Curve." They presented it as a "menu of choice" for policymakers.